Generalizing König's infinity lemma
نویسنده
چکیده
1 Introduction D. Kόnig's famous lemma on trees has many applications; in graph theory it is used to extend certain results from finite to infinite graphs (see Nash-Williams [7]); in logic it can be used to prove that a denumerable set of propositional formulas is satisfiable if every finite subset is (see, for example, Van Fraassen [9]). This last result, known as the compactness theorem for propositional logic, is even true when "denumerable" is replaced by "infinite" and thus it seems reasonable to ask whether the stronger form can be obtained from a generalized Kόnig's lemma. We shall show that this is indeed the case.
منابع مشابه
Mapping among the nodes of infinite trees: A variation of Kőnig's infinity lemma
Koenig’s infinity lemma states that an infinite rooted tree in which every node has finite degree has an infinite path. A variation of this lemma about mappings from one tree to another is presented in this note. Its proof utilizes Koenig’s lemma, and Koenig’s lemma follows from this variation.
متن کاملRealization of aperiodic subshifts and densities in groups
A Theorem of Gao, Jackson and Seward, originally conjectured to be false by Glasner and Uspenskij, asserts that every countable group admits a 2-coloring. A direct consequence of this result is that every countable group has a strongly aperiodic subshift on the alphabet {0, 1}. In this article, we use Lovász local lemma to first give a new simple proof of this result, and second to prove the ex...
متن کاملSeparation and Weak König's Lemma
We continue the work of [14, 3, 1, 19, 16, 4, 12, 11, 20] investigating the strength of set existence axioms needed for separable Banach space theory. We show that the separation theorem for open convex sets is equivalent to WKL0 over RCA0. We show that the separation theorem for separably closed convex sets is equivalent to ACA0 over RCA0. Our strategy for proving these geometrical Hahn–Banach...
متن کاملComments and Corrections
The proof of Theorem 1 (stochastic Barbalat’s lemma) in the paper by Wu et al. is incorrect. This note provides a new statement of stochastic Barbalat’s lemma. In addition, some definitions, propositions, and proofs are given to replace those in the paper by Wu et al.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
دوره 18 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1977